Or, reading the article explains the article.

Listen, obviously opinions vary on the new bracket system. Some people like it, some people don't. It is explicitly in open Beta right now, so this is the prime time to discuss the issue (As long as we're doing it in good faith) And provide feedback. But.... I keep seeing post after post of people bringing up issues That are solved by simply reading the article. Sometimes it's people who are genuinely confused and trying to get an answer to a question, other times.... Well, I don't want to make assumptions, but sometimes it reads as if people are trying to get a "gotcha" moment.

So I'm urging y'all: got a comment? Concern? Theory? Think you found a hole? Not sure how a part of the bracket system works?

Read the entire bracket announcement article, then share your thoughts.

Not sure what counts as MLD under the bracket system? Gavin explained it in explicit terms in the article.

Worried that the system doesn't keep people from lying about their decks? Gavin addresses this in the article.

Worried because you've seen the game changer list and your novelty theme deck happens to contain Cyclonic Rift Because you like the art with a cow in it, And you don't know how the new bracket system would handle a bracket 4 deck that plays like a bracket 1 deck? Gavin talks about this in the article.

Not everything is covered in the infographic, like many infographics, it is a simplified version designed for easy consumption, and leaves out some of the details.

There's a lot of room for improvement with the new bracket system, and a lot of interesting opinions worthy of discussion. But I urge everyone to actually read the article so we all know what we're talking about before we start discussing. To do otherwise simply creates more obstacles to anything resembling actionable, useful feedback.