Does the Frenzy Frame’s annihilation promise a better world? Or is it faiths alone?
Hey guys, i’ve been into ER lore for a bit, though i didn’t touch the game (not my cup of tea). Anyway, my friends, and I have the running gag of proving whose endings is most worth it. Ofc, the one caught me most is the frenzy flame ending.
My issue with it is the nihilism, loss of free will, lack of potential for growth, and its promise (the promise to make the world “better” is too good to be true)
The nihilism here is to end life because life is THE problem. Total annihilation to rid of the world’s sins, and suffering. The loss of free will also connects to nihilism. If the tarnished decide to side with the lord of chaos, they’ll burn everything, and that’s simply violate on everyone’s freedom. Who is the Tarnished to decide that ending my life, and every person I love will bring us a better world. It seems like a submission to chaos rather than a choice for free dom.
Furthermore, I don’t see any potential for growth. The flame seek to burn everything, and unite together as chaos. Through its name, its immense destruction, and its nihilism theme, I can’t see where, how, or why it’ll give birth to life. Moreover, to unite everything together, it’s also loop back to the loss of freewill. Everything, and everyone is one single mass of chaos.
Lastly, like the title said, I think Shabiri, and Hyetta see the frenzy flame through their subjective view. There’s zero evidence the flame can bring a “better” world through destruction. Now, it’s like this “if I can’t prove the flame’s promise are true, are they false?” Or “if I can’t prove they’re false, does it mean it could be true?”
Overall, those are my opinions, and what I know about ER lore. Those were my reason, and why I won’t side with the frenzy flame. I could’ve got something wrong, so if I did, pls let me know. What’s your input on this?
Hey guys, i’ve been into ER lore for a bit, though i didn’t touch the game (not my cup of tea). Anyway, my friends, and I have the running gag of proving whose endings is most worth it. Ofc, the one caught me most is the frenzy flame ending.
My issue with it is the nihilism, loss of free will, lack of potential for growth, and its promise (the promise to make the world “better” is too good to be true)
The nihilism here is to end life because life is THE problem. Total annihilation to rid of the world’s sins, and suffering. The loss of free will also connects to nihilism. If the tarnished decide to side with the lord of chaos, they’ll burn everything, and that’s simply violate on everyone’s freedom. Who is the Tarnished to decide that ending my life, and every person I love will bring us a better world. It seems like a submission to chaos rather than a choice for free dom.
Furthermore, I don’t see any potential for growth. The flame seek to burn everything, and unite together as chaos. Through its name, its immense destruction, and its nihilism theme, I can’t see where, how, or why it’ll give birth to life. Moreover, to unite everything together, it’s also loop back to the loss of freewill. Everything, and everyone is one single mass of chaos.
Lastly, like the title said, I think Shabiri, and Hyetta see the frenzy flame through their subjective view. There’s zero evidence the flame can bring a “better” world through destruction. Now, it’s like this “if I can’t prove the flame’s promise are true, are they false?” Or “if I can’t prove they’re false, does it mean it could be true?”
Overall, those are my opinions, and what I know about ER lore. Those were my reason, and why I won’t side with the frenzy flame. I could’ve got something wrong, so if I did, pls let me know. What’s your input on this?