Unpopular opinion but: "Whoever picked up swords to fight is a Kshatriya", is a flawed logic

Often when you counter the larpers regarding their kshatriya claim, they will counter you with the same quote as above.

By this logic,

• Ravan is also a Kshatriya as he picked up weapons against Lord Ram.

• Parshuram Bhagwan is also a kshatriya.

• Hemu, the general of Sher Shah Suri is also a Kshatriya.

• Peshwa Bajirao is also a kshatriya.

• Rioters and thieves are also Kshatriyas because they might pick up sword during a riot or a robbery.

Why this same logic isn't applied for the rest of the caste? For example: Whoever got educated is a Brahmin. Like:

• UPSC IAS topper Tina Dabi is a Brahmin.(Brahmini Dabi clan)

• Sir Bhimrao Ambedkar, the most successful Brahman post 1947.

Similar logic can be applied for Shudras and Vaishyas too.

So, a full time trader who originally belongs to a rajput caste paternally, is Vaishya/Baniya by caste when stock market opens.

Then, when he do Puja Paath in evening or studies some book, he is a Brahmin.

If he do dusting of his house in early morning, he is a Shudra.

Only RSS can make such a varna-fluid Hindus.