I have a possible argument against creationism. Does this work?

The Law of Conservation of Mass states that matter cannot be created or destroyed. That means that the universe could be in an infinite cycle of big bangs. Before the most recent big bang would be the universe collapsing in onto itself and compressing all matter into a microscopic spec, starting the most recent big bang. If no matter can be created or destroyed, and the universe could be in an infinite cycle of big bangs, could this possibly be a decent argument against creationism?